« Scott Clark on Re-Publication in Moses | Main | Basic Covenant Theology (#27) »

Some thoughts on family worship

Posted on Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 01:57PM by Registered CommenterMichael Brown in | Comments23 Comments

family.jpgWhen I first became exposed to Reformed Christianity, one of the things that stood out vividly to me was the practice of family prayer or "family worship." In the revivalist, evangelical world in which I grew up, this practice was never emphasized. To be sure, the church in which I was raised highly encouraged the important devotional acts of praying and reading one's Bible, but I can't ever remember a pastor emphasizing the necessity and importance of regular family worship during the week. Instead, there was a full array of programs and small groups offered, each tailor-made to every member of the family: Jr.High group, high school group, college-and-career, men's group, ladies' group, young marrieds, married-with-children, empty-nesters, etc., etc. Not that everything in all of these groups was always bad. It's just that there seemed to be an emphasis upon separating the family as a unit during the week in order to "minister" to each person's needs.

Oddly enough, Sunday worship wasn't much different. My family would arrive at church only to split up into our segregated groups for worship: I, a "youth pastor," would go to the high school "worship service," while my wife went into the main service with the adults, and my daughters went to "children's' church" with the toddlers. The first time we worshiped together as a family was the first Sunday we visited Escondido United Reformed Church!

Coming to Reformed Christianity, my wife and I not only learned the sobering truth about the means of grace and what actually happens during the Divine Service on the Lord's Day, we also learned about the vital importance of regular family worship throughout the week. Clearly, this was a far more biblical practice (and with historical precedent) than the compartmentalized, hustle-bustle of a busy week at church. The ancient paths God carved out for families to walk in long ago were new to us. We learned how he designed the family to be a worshiping unit, an entity that would engage in prayer, praise and instruction in the course of ordinary, daily life. We learned how Christian parents have the covenantal responsibility—both toward God and their children—of bringing up their little ones as disciples in the historic Christian faith. Suddenly, all those passages about training up your children began to come into color:

Deut 6.4-9: Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And these words that I command you today shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.

Eph 6.4: “Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord”

Passages such as these, however, cannot be reduced to mere proof-texts for sending our children to Christian schools or buying Christian home-school curriculum. They require of us something far more vital than that. In the first place, they require the indispensable practice of the “family pew,” that is, a commitment of bringing our children to corporate worship every week. In worship, our children - no less than us - are summoned by God to receive his good gifts, confess their sins, and bring him praise and honor as the Creator and Redeemer of his people.

But these commands also require a commitment to daily catechesis so that our children will know what they believe and why they believe it. This is precisely why the sixteenth-century Protestant Reformers, as well as the seventeenth-century Puritans who followed them, wrote rich catechisms and strongly advocated the practice of family worship. They understood each family to be a ‘little church,’ in which the father was called to be priest and spiritual head of his home under Christ.

It is for this reason that the Westminster Confession of Faith teaches that worship is to be conducted “in private families daily” (21.6). This was taken so seriously by our fathers in the faith, that the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland not only included in its editions of the Westminster Standards a "Directory for Family Worship," but even mandated disciplinary action against heads of households who neglected “this necessary duty"!

Hughes Oliphant Old describes the rhythm of family worship in Puritan life:

What the liturgy of the hours was for monks of the Middle Ages, the discipline of family prayer was for the Puritans. The typical Puritan home of seventeenth-century England may not have looked much like the splendid cloisters of Cluny, but there was something in common. The daily life of both Catholic monk and Puritan family man was ordered by a rhythm of prayer and praise. With Cistercian solemnity, the Puritan household would gather around the dinner table, father, mother, children, a maiden aunt, perhaps servants or an apprentice. A metrical psalm was sung. Then the head of the house would open up a great leather bound family Bible and read a chapter. This finished, the father would lead in prayer. The Puritans, whether on the Connecticut frontier or in the heart of London, whether they were Cambridge scholars or Shropshire cotters, gave great importance to maintaining a daily discipline of family prayer.

So what happened in the church that we have lost this vital practice? Why have we forgotten the wisdom of these ancient paths? As with most questions in historical theology, there is not one easy answer. There are several contributing factors that led to the corrosion of this practice. One of them, however, must certainly be the rise of American pragmatism.

As Americans, we have an unquenchable thirst for knowing the cash value of something. It may seem to many American Christians that investing in the rigorous daily duty of family worship is too costly. After all, getting a family in 2008 to meet together regularly around a table and take out thirty minutes of the day may seem almost impossible. It would require reordering and restructuring our daily lives. It would require slowing down a little bit. It would require...wait for it...turning off the television a little more (gasp!).

The fact of the matter is, family worship is a great investment. In fact, it is a no-brainer. It pays such high dividends that it is - to use the modern vernacular - like stealing money. In fact, I cannot think of many things in life that pay greater dividends than the ordinary practice of daily family worship. Let me quote Presbyterian minister Terry Johnson to give you an idea of what I mean:

If your children are in your home for 18 years, you have [over 5,600] occasions (figuring a 6 day week) for family worship. If you learn a new Psalm or hymn each month, they will be exposed to 216 in those 18 years. If you read a chapter a day, you will complete the Bible 4.5 times in 18 years. Every day they will affirm a creed or recite the law. Every day they will confess their sins and plead for mercy. Every day they will intercede on behalf of others. Think in terms of the long view. What is the cumulative impact of just 15 minutes of this each day, day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, for 18 years? At the rate of 6 days a week (excluding Sunday), one spends an hour and a half a week in family worship (about the length of a home Bible study), 78 hours a year (about the length of two weekend retreats), and 1,404 hours over the course of 18 years (about the length of eight week-long summer camps). When you establish your priorities, think in terms of the cumulative effect of this upon your children. Think of the cumulative effect of this upon you, after 40 or 60 or 80 years of daily family worship. All this without having to drive anywhere.

The family is essentially a discipleship group. In praying and reading the Bible together (and maybe singing too), the whole family is being spiritually nurtured as the truths of the historic Christian faith are pressed before them each day. Parents are humbled as they are constrained to assume the role of priest for their family. They are driven to their knees in a sense of inadequacy of such a task. They are forced to adjust their lifestyle in order to carry out the responsibility of raising their children in the Lord. And they are confronted with the reality of appearing either consistent or inconsistent in the eyes of their little ones.

In the meantime, children are growing up watching their parents humble themselves before the Lord. They are learning of Christ’s claim and Lordship on their lives. They are absorbing Scripture and realizing its authority. They are provided with a medium for reinforcing memorization of Scripture, catechism questions, creeds, the Lord’s Prayer, etc. And they are seeing how they are different than the world in that God has set them apart as his own special people. All of this has a great effect on covenant children: it is part of the means God uses to bring them to faith.

But as you read this, you may be thinking, “Fine. I agree. Consistent family worship seems indispensable. But where do I begin? How do I do family worship?” Let me offer a few recommendations:

First, FIND A TIME that works well for your family. For many, this will be the dinner table. Believe it or not, it is actually very simple to transition from eating a meal together (an invaluable and neglected practice in itself) to having family worship without ever leaving the table. On the other hand, maybe bedtime will be more conducive for your family. Whatever the case, just find a time in which everyone in the family is together for at least 15-20 minutes a day. If no such time exists for your family, then you desperately need to make one! Settle on a time that will become as fixed a routine for your family as getting dressed or brushing teeth. Settle on it and guard it! When the phone rings, let the answering machine pick it up. Instead of being enslaved to technology, let it serve you!

Second, KEEP IT SIMPLE. There is no reason to make family worship long or complex. You can keep it as simple as these three elements: Scripture reading, catechism and prayer.

With regard to Scripture reading, try reading a chapter a day, working your way through particular books of the Bible. Perhaps on certain days, read the passage that was preached in worship the previous Lord’s Day. This will help your family to review what you heard and hopefully develop a practice of meditating on it during the week.

For catechism, work on memory with your children. Teach them to memorize the Lord’s Prayer, Ten Commandments and the Apostles’ Creed. Then move on to Heidelberg Catechism Q.1, breaking it down in to parts until they have the whole thing mastered. Move on from there to these essential questions: ##2-5, 21, 27, 60, 65, 69, 75, 86, 116. It will take a while (maybe years), but despite what you might think, they can do it. Be patient. Think long term. Don’t give up.

With regard to prayer, teach your children how to pray by modeling it for them. Conclude family worship with the simple acrostic A-C-T-S: adoration of God, confession of sins, thanksgiving for all he has done and given, and supplications for those in need. This is a great opportunity to pull out the bulletin and look at the particular prayer needs in the congregation, teaching our little ones to intercede for others in the household of God.

You may also consider singing a Psalm or hymn together before reading Scripture. But whatever the case, family worship should only take about 15 or 20 minutes. Seriously. There is no reason to turn this into a massive ordeal. In fact, fathers, resist the temptation to do that! Once in a while, you may find your family engaged in an extended discussion over a particular doctrine or theological question. It is a beautiful thing when this happens spontaneously and naturally. But don't force it. Ask a few questions, keep it simple, and conclude. If your family comes to expect a forty-five to sixty minute Bible study from dad, they may begin to dread the exercise.

Third, GET STARTED! To borrow an old slogan from Nike, “Just do it!” Don’t procrastinate and put it off. Each day your children get a little older. Redeem the time given to you.

Fourth, BE CONSISTENT. When you miss a day (or two or three!), don’t throw in the towel. Get back on track and go. Too much is at stake to give up.

Finally, Dad, Mom, BE SUPPORTIVE OF ONE ANOTHER. Satan is against you in this, so be prepared. He wants nothing more than for you to pick at one another during family worship, become frustrated and quit. He wants you to leave the Bible and catechism book on the shelf and reach for the remote at the time you have designated for family worship. He wants wives to be resistant and husbands to be lazy. So, encourage, support and be respectful of one another as you engage in this daily practice.

Family worship is a joy, but it takes work. It usually requires some rearranging of our priorities in daily life. And if you are getting a late start with your kids, it will probably be met with some resistance. Pray for one another with regard to your duties in this simple, but awesome practice.

Reader Comments (23)

Good stuff, Mike.

Yes, it is a task to get this off the ground with so many obstacles cluttering one's way, not the least of which is a religious consumerism many Reformed like to believe they have shaken off (but haven't).

Case and point: You and yours worship at the beach, eh? Kidding, I kid.

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZrim

Actually, that was just before our evening service. We worship at the beach. What better place to do baptisms?

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

Definitely an area I struggle in (having also come from the "revivalist evangelical" world). Thank you for this and thank you most of all for instructions as to "how to" do this. It's so important and I know that, and I'm one who "intends" to do this and at the end of the day all of my intentions have drifted into nothingness.

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBarbara

You are welcome, Barbara. Press on!

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

Thanks, Mike, for this excellent post!

Yesterday I preached a sermon on family worship in a neighbouring congregation. It's been one of my long-standing convictions (even before I was married) that family worship is crucial for the spiritual well-being, not only of our families, but also our churches. Parents, especially fathers, have to "man up" and be the front-line youth pastors.

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterWes Bredenhof

Wes,

I couldn't agree more. Keep up the good work north of the border!

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

This is absolutely great pastoral advice.

I'd just like to offer one more reason for the break down of such Christian practices. Western society saw a decline in institutional patterns of behavior throughout the 19th century. One scholar of 19th c. British religious history has argued that the crisis of faith that so many Christians experienced during this time was largely due to their growing neglect of institutional habits. In other words, he argues that this neglect resulted in failing faith rather than, as has been presumed, loss of faith resulted in no longer participating in church life. This underscores the utter importance of the church to our spiritual formation.

Society today makes participation extremely easy. On one level, as heirs of the Enlightenment, we now take for granted an extreme form of individualism that is intrinsic to our ideas of the social contract. That is, we plug into society immediately upon our volition, not through social order or a, especially, hierarchy. On another level, technology makes social participation not only immediate but it also parodies our natural affinities. We shun our families for our on-line groups. Together, these have corroded our toleration for institutional models for social participation.

What you offer here as the biblical and Reformed model for family (an institution; a basic unit of society) worship is radically antithetical to what contemporary society offers as its own model. The utterly radical and very earthy model of family life written about here also lends itself to an organic way of transforming our culture by extension.

These are big-picture ideas that his post has led me to think about. I acknowledge that you're focused on something very specific--family worship, within the home and during an alloted time. However, the implications for this very simple act of solidarity is radical and can reverberate in to the broader culture in ways you allude to by quoting Terry Johnson.

Again, thanks for this post and I'm looking forward to the future ones. Many blessings, Mike

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMichael P.

I missed one grammatical error and one spelling error, so please read through them.

I also wanted to say that the ideas I bring up in my post could be cross referenced in Charles Taylor's A Secular Age.

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMichael P.

Michael P,

While I would argue that the commission of the Church is not to transform culture but to make disciples (i.e. the difference between the cultural mandate in creation and the Great Commission in redemption), I agree that when the church acts like the church, it often has - as an incidental byproduct - a positive effect in the culture in which it is found.

W/o question, the discipline of family worship is biblical piety (i.e. the church acting like the church). Could it lend itself to an organic transformation of culture? I don't know. Perhaps in some way. But it certainly serves an important part of our commission to make disciples.

July 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

Bravo Mike!

This post is most helpful. After so many years of being away from my revivalist background, I had forgotten some of the moralistic, pietistic (et al.) practices in which our revivalistic brothers and sisters engage - and also some Biblically Reformed practices which, sadly, are missing from their piety. After clicking on the link you provided (that leads to your former revivalist church) and reading at the end of a "sinners prayer" the words "now you are saved" (BECAUSE you repented by repeating this prayer with no mention of Christ's righteousness! etc.) it all came rushing back. Though there is no perfectly pure church on earth I am, nonetheless, profoundly grateful for our Biblically reformed heritage. OH!... and thanks for using the phrase, "Reformed Christianity" instead of "the Reformed faith;" this is a pet peeve of mine that makes me cringe every time I hear it! Your post needs to be turned into a booklet if it has not been already.

Alex Garleb

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterAG

Nice an idea as it sounds, I've never been all that clear on how sanctification translates into transformation, either personally/organically or socially/insitutionally.

Maybe that is because it is no where in the ordo salutis where glorification follows sanctification. Finding "transformation" in the formula seems a lot like those who, soteriologically, find middle ways between Calvinism and Arminianism, or, existentially, those to conjure up tri-partite being (body, spirit and soul) over against bi-partite (body and soul).

All these systems need to be given Nobel Prizes for finding things that aren't there.

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZrim

Zrim,

You said, Nice an idea as it sounds, I've never been all that clear on how sanctification translates into transformation, either personally/organically or socially/insitutionally.

You realize that I am not arguing for the transformation of culture nor believe that the church is called to such a task.

With regard to sanctification and personal transformation, how do you understand progressive sanctification and passages such as Romans 12.1-2?

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

Mike,

Yes, that is quite clear. What catches my eye, though, is when we leave the door open that "transformation" has a place anywhere. But I don't find it anywhere in our formulations. I find a trove on sanctification and its related categories, but I never find "transformation."

Ro 12:1-2 seems to be a sort of go-to verse for those who want to hold out for the T-word. But it seems to me that Reformed hermeneutics teaches that we are to examine our biases, etc. when we come to texts like this, as well as to put it in context with others. When "transform" is used in our time and place I think it has a lot more in common with that which comports with the immediate spirituality of pietism, the culture of the therapeutic and self-improvement, etc. Paul's equivalent would have been the super-apostles. And since he had "under-realized" things to say about them, it is hard for me to believe he'd have much sympathy for our version of super-apostleship, sacred or secular.

In other words, I don't read "sanctification and personal transformation" analogously; I read Paul's "transformed" with progressive sanctifying lenses.

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZrim

Zrim,

In other words, I don't read "sanctification and personal transformation" analogously; I read Paul's "transformed" with progressive sanctifying lenses.

I think I am with you, but just so I am clear, give me a brief sketch in your understanding of what happens as one is progressively sanctified, or transformed by the renewal of the mind.

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

Mike,


It seems to me that the Reformed tradition is nothing if not correctly prone to a certain measure of duality (in/visible; militant/triumphant; body/soul; this age/the age to come; already/not yet; Creator/creature; archetypal/ectypal, etc.)

That said, I guess I'd like to say that I don't think we give enough room to mystery in these sorts of things. I think we should be able to say "I don't know what it looks like" as much as we may say what it does look like. From God's view, He sees a change that is not immediately discernible to us. I don't think the language of "transformation" as I described it above likes that very much. It wants things immediately known and easily discerned.

But when the question is, "What does it look like," I think it simply looks like a conformity to the Law. RSC has spoken of the law as "that which gives our sanctification structure." I like that. The Law seems to be that thing given as a place-holder until our sanctification becomes glorification. I suppose, in a word, it is a quickened affect with regard to the Law.

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZrim

Zrim,

But when the question is, "What does it look like," I think it simply looks like a conformity to the Law. RSC has spoken of the law as "that which gives our sanctification structure." I like that. The Law seems to be that thing given as a place-holder until our sanctification becomes glorification. I suppose, in a word, it is a quickened affect with regard to the Law.

Fair enough. We have to do justice what God has revealed in the NT about conformity to the image of Christ. Granted, our tradition has always said that that transformation involves mystery and the tension of the already-not yet (just think of all the statements in the TFU in this regard, let alone Calvin). Conformity to the law is a good way of putting it.

It reminds me of the time I asked Darryl Hart if he could some up the Christian life in one word. He said, "That's easy: 'Submit!'"

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

You're a tough questioner. Seems to me that Darryl passed. I'm glad my answer reminds you of his. Maybe you could find the time to weigh in on my last post that runs along the lines of submission:

http://confessionalouthouse.wordpress.com/2008/07/13/christian-religionists-and-exact-justice-an-sos-for-silence-obedience-and-submission/

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZrim

Zrim,

This is the part of your statement that troubles me: I think we should be able to say "I don't know what it looks like" as much as we may say what it does look like.

Granted, God will always see what we cannot during the haze of the A/NY, but the NT reveals enough for us to say: it looks like Xp, it looks like his law. The Lord has mercifully made that much pretty clear.

July 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

Mike,

Agreed. I am not sure what ails. I am not saying we don't know what it looks like, and I have no qualms with "it looks like Xp, it looks like his law." Isn't that what "the law gives our sanctification its structure" might mean?

My point, when I say "I don't know what it looks like," has been to simply give more credence to the mysterious nature of our sanctification, the part God sees. For now, as we exist as pilgrims, Calvinism still holds and we ought to see ourselves as always more sinful than not. But at the same time that doesn't mean at all we cannot discern fruit. We can and should.

July 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterZrim

Fair enough. :)

July 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMike Brown

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>