The Eternal Foundation of Imputation
In his 1655 work against the Socinians, Vindiciae Evangelicae, Owen described the covenant of redemption (pactum salutis) as “that compact, covenant, convention, or agreement, that was between the Father and the Son, for the accomplishment of the work of our redemption by the mediation of Christ, to the praise of the glorious grace of God.” (XII, 497.) He saw five major elements within this covenant:
(i) The Father, as “promiser,” and the Son, as “undertaker,” voluntarily agreed together in counsel to achieve a common purpose, namely, “the glory of God and the salvation of the elect.” (XII, 498-500. Owen cited Prov 8.22-31; Ps 60.14; Isaiah 9.6; Zech 4.12-13; 13.7; Heb 2.9-10; 12.2.)
(ii) The Father prescribed conditions for this covenant, which consisted of the Son assuming human nature, fulfilling the demands of the law through his obedience, and suffering the just judgment of God for the elect in order to satisfy God’s justice on their behalf. (XII, 499, 501-2. Owen cited Job 33.23, 24; Isa 42.1; 49.5; 53.10; John 14.28; Rom 8.3; Gal 4.4; Phil 2.6-7; Heb 10.5-9. See also X, 168-174; XXII, 446-481.)
(iii) The promises of the covenant, which were two: First, the Father assisting the Son in the accomplishment of his redeeming work by continually being present with him as he underwent the afflictions and trials of his earthly life. Secondly, if the Son did what was required of him, the work itself would prosper by bringing about the deliverance and glorification of those for whom he obeyed and suffered. These promises the Father confirmed with an oath. (XII, 499, 503-5. Owen cited Ps 16.10-11; 22.30-31; 89.27-28; Isa 42.4, 6; 50.5-9; 52.1-4; 53.10,11; Heb 5.7; 7.21, 28; 12.2. See also X, 168-71.)
(iv) The Son voluntarily accepted the conditions, and assumed the work as surety of the covenant. (XII, 499, 505. Owen cited Ps 16.2; 40.7-8; Isa 50.5; Phil 2.6-8. See also X, 174.)
(v) The Father approved and accepted the performance of the Son, who likewise laid claim to the promises made in the covenant. (XII, 499, 505-507. Owen cited Job 33.24; Ps 2.7-8; Isa 49.5-9; Dan 9.24; Acts 13.33; Rom 1.4; Jn 17; Heb 7.25; 9.24.)
Where Owen made a significant contribution to the seventeenth-century development of this doctrine was in his consideration of the Holy Spirit’s function in the covenant of redemption. This was, according to Carl Trueman, “a point which represents a distinctly Trinitarian advance on the works of Fisher and Bulkeley who, with their exclusive attention to the Father-Son relationship were arguably vulnerable to the accusation of developing a sub-Trinitarian foundation for the economy of salvation.” (John Owen: Reformed Catholic, Renaissance Man, 80) Owen was careful to describe the distinct roles of each Person in the Godhead, showing the Trinitarian nature of salvation. With regard to the Holy Spirit, it was through him that the Virgin Mary conceived the Incarnate Christ, that the Son offered himself to the Father, and that the Son was raised from the dead. The Spirit also brings the elect into union with Christ their Savior efficaciously and keeps them secure. ( X, 163-78; XI, 336ff. For an example of how Owen preached on the roles of each divine Person of the Godhead in the covenant of redemption, see his sermon, “The Everlasting Covenant, the Believer’s Support under Distress,” (1669), in Works, vol. IX, 418-19.)
As with many federalist theologians of his day, Owen viewed the covenant of redemption as an intra-Trinitarian covenant that made explicit Christ’s role as the second Adam and federal head, who, on behalf of those given to him by the Father, overcame the catastrophic consequences of the first Adam’s breaking of the covenant of works, and merited the benefits of redemption mediated in the covenant of grace. His view of the covenant of redemption provided the foundation for his understanding of imputed active obedience, for apart from this covenant from eternity past, Christ would not have come as the surety and mediator in the covenant of grace, and the Holy Spirit would not have united the elect to Christ.


Reader Comments (1)
Pastor Brown,
I was wondering if you know whether or not Owen wrote about the Spirit's work at the Consummation aside from resurrecting and glorifying the saints...? Does Owen ever write anywhere about the Spirit's work of dissolving the present heavens and earth and creating the new heavens and earth?
I have his works but have not had much of a chance to really read through them yet. I figured that since you've been reading a lot of his work that you might know off hand about this.
My question is spurred on by having just finished a mini series of sermons (2) on the Person and work of the Holy Spirit. It is also spurred on by your mention of Owen's writing having made a significant contribution to 17th C. development of the doctrine the Covenant of Redemption in relation to the Holy Spirit.
Blessings,
Brad